Weekly
Commentary
August
11 ,
2008
The
Markets
A big drop in oil prices helped fuel a significant rise
in stock prices last week. However, is there normally a
neat and tidy inverse relationship between oil prices and
stock prices?
Crude oil prices dropped 7.9% last week while the Dow Jones
Industrial Average popped 3.6%, according to The Wall Street
Journal. The Dow’s rise included two days of more
than 300-point gains. Since its July 3 high, crude oil
prices have now dropped 21% as of last Friday, according
to the Journal. Believe it or not, that suggests oil prices
are now in a “bear market,” as measured by
the traditional definition of that usually dreaded condition.
Interestingly, since crude oil’s July 3 high, and
subsequent 21% drop, the Dow has risen just 3.9%. Going
back a little further, oil prices have risen about 66%
for the 12 months ending August 8, while the Dow has dropped
only 11.4%, according to the Journal. Clearly, there are
other factors at play in the market. We still have credit
issues to deal with; we have concerns about corporate earnings;
and inflation is still a concern, although the recent drop
in oil prices may help ease some of the pressure.
At various times, the stock market may become fixated on
a certain indicator and then trade off that indicator for
a period. For example, back in the late 1970s and early
1980s, the money supply figure was widely watched by analysts.
At other times, corporate earnings, the value of the dollar,
the consumer price index, weekly jobless claims, and a
myriad of other numbers took center stage. Currently, oil
prices are grabbing headlines, but the inverse relationship
between oil prices and stock prices does not appear to
be strong – except perhaps on certain days.
When all is said and done, the stock market tries to take
into consideration just about everything that could possibly
affect prices. The difficulty of staying on top of all
these potential factors is one reason why it’s so
hard to outsmart the market. However, that doesn’t
stop us from trying!
| Returns through 7/25/08
|
1-Week |
Y-T-D |
1-Year |
3-Year |
5-Year |
10-Year |
| Dow Jones Industrials |
3.6
|
-11.5
|
-11.4
|
3.5
|
5.0
|
3.2
|
| Nasdaq Composite |
4.5
|
-9.0
|
-5.1
|
3.7
|
8.0
|
2.8
|
| Standard & Poor's 500 |
2.9
|
-11.7
|
-10.8
|
2.0
|
5.8
|
1.8
|
Source: Yahoo! Finance, Barrons Past
performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly.
Three-, 5-, and 10-year returns are annualized. Assumes dividends are not reinvested.
THE CHINESE STOCK MARKET IS A GREAT EXAMPLE of why it
is so important to preserve capital in times of market
difficulty. If we go back to December 29, 2006, the benchmark
Shanghai Composite Index (SCI), which tracks both the yuan-denominated
A shares, as well as B shares priced in foreign currency,
closed at 2,674, according to data from Yahoo! Finance.
By the end of 2007, the SCI had nearly doubled to close
the year at 5,261. So far, so good. However, as 2008 dawned,
the Chinese stock market began a dramatic slump. As of
last Friday, the SCI closed at 2,605, which represents
a year-to-date loss of just over 50%, according to MarketWatch.
Notice the symmetry here. The SCI rose nearly 100% in 2007,
then dropped about 50% in 2008, which left the index at
almost the same price as it began in 2007. On the surface,
it doesn’t make sense. If the market rose 100% in
one year, then dropped 50% the next, shouldn’t it
still be up on a cumulative basis? No, and that’s
why capital preservation is critical.
Here’s how the math works. Let’s pick a starting
number, in this case we’ll use 200. Now, if we double
it, i.e., a 100% increase, the ending value is 400. In
year two, let’s say we cut that number by 50%. Now
we’re right back to 200 – right where we started.
This is essentially what happened to the Chinese market
since the end of 2006. The near doubling in 2007 was wiped
out by the subsequent 50% drop in 2008.
This mathematical structure also helps explain why the
NASDAQ Composite Index is still far below its all-time
closing high of 5,048 set way back on March 10, 2000. The
brutal bear market that followed took the NASDAQ down to
1,114 on October 9, 2002, which represents about a 78%
decline, according to data from Yahoo! Finance. Doing the
math, the NASDAQ would have to rise more than 350% in order
to recoup that 78% decline – a tall order to say
the least. As of last Friday, it had added back about 116%
of the 350%.
Stock market gains are hard fought so we try to do everything
we can to help ensure we maintain those gains and not get
into the mathematical hole of trying to dig out of a big
loss.
Weekly Focus – Unity and the Opening Ceremony
The opening ceremony at the Summer Olympics was simply
spectacular. It’s comforting to know that there’s
at least one time and one place where 204 countries can
gather and put aside their differences. Let’s hope
the good feelings continue during the games and long after
the Olympic torch is extinguished.
Sincerely
for the firm,
Kerrick W. Bubb
President,
KWB Wealth Managers Group
LPL Registered Principal
The
Wealth Managers (CA Insurance #0732669) of KWB & Associates,
Inc. (KWB) are registered representatives with and offer
advisory services and securities through Linsco/Private
Ledger (LPL) Member FINRA/SIPC. Insurance products offered through Private Ledger Insurance
Services of California, Inc.
Not FDIC Insured • May Lose Value • No Bank Or Credit
Union Guarantee • Not A Deposit • Not Insured By Any Federal
Government Agency Or NCUA.
* The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P
500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be
representative of the stock market in general.
* The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a
price-weighted index of 30 actively traded blue-chip stocks.
* The Nasdaq Composite Index is an unmanaged,
market-weighted index of all over-the-counter common stocks
traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers
Automated Quotation System.
* Yahoo! Finance is the source
for any reference to the performance of an index between
two specific periods.
* Opinions expressed are
subject to change without notice and are not intended as
investment advice or to predict future performance.
* Consult your financial
professional before making any investment decision.
* Past performance does
not guarantee future results.
|